The similarity index is the overall percentage similarity between the text of your manuscript and published text. By default, the program will.Similarity Check "helps editors compare the text of submitted papers for similarity" ( ).similarity to your manuscript text. Publication volunteers and vendors who are interested in integrating CrossCheck within their manuscript submission systems can use the iThenticate API guide to get started.Click on the gray similarity index box to go to the Document Viewer to see your similarity report side-by-side with your file. IEEE CrossCheck Portal Guide (PDF, 3.2 MB) iThenticate API Guide. It also helps users review and interpret CrossCheck Similarity Reports and explain what actions to take.
SimilarityIf exclusion options are applied to the document our system would recalculate the similarity index percentage and remove all matches that the exclusion option.Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs) are encouraged to use Similarity Check via the licence held by the publisher of the Cochrane Library, John Wiley & Sons. This high-stakes plagiarism checking tool is the gold standard for academic researchers and publishers. Deliver and grade all types of assessments from anywhere using this modern assessment platform. Getting started with Crossref Similarity CheckAddress the originality of student work and emerging trends in misconduct with this comprehensive solution. When a document is checked in Similarity Check, it is compared with the content of this database which is made up of published and unpublished documents, including over 40 million research articles, conference proceedings, and e-books from scientific, technical, and medical publishing. It includes material behind journal paywalls that would not be available from a simple internet search.
New citation version)Abstract, Plain language summary, Background b, Methods b, Results, Discussion, Authors’ conclusionsOmit (1) matches to the published protocol from the similarity report and (2) referencesAll resubmissions of revised reviews or review ‘amendments’Omit (1) matches to the published protocol (2) published previous versions of the review from the similarity report c and (3) referencesA While it is possible to check an entire document for similar text, sections of a Cochrane Review, such as the methods, characteristics of studies tables, and references sections, are likely to give a high similarity score due to the nature of their content. Different stages in the editorial process where Similarity Check screening could occurSubstantively updated protocols (i.e. CRGs may wish to screen more than once, or they may wish to screen at a particular time, such as before peer review, or where the writing styles varies within a single document. What and when to checkCRGs are encouraged to, at minimum, check at least a portion of text for all protocols and reviews (including updates) when initially submitted to the CRG.There are different stages in the editorial process where Similarity Check screening could occur (see Table 1). For a user name and password, Managing Editors can contact Tony Aburrow ( Cochrane Editor, Wiley.
These two steps combined can take from 5 minutes to 2 hours, but it is usually around 15 minutes. There are two steps to using Similarity Check: (1) an automated step in which Similarity Check runs the online comparison and (2) a manual step for someone in the Cochrane Review Group to interpret the report results and decide on next steps see Table 2. How to checkSimilarity Check provides a similarity score, which indicates the total amount of text that matches text in other sources. C It is possible to do this in Similarity Check see Table 3. See ‘Special circumstances for Cochrane Systematic Reviews’ for more information. If so, the authors should have made a note of this within the protocol or review.
Therefore it may be easier to select specific sections of the protocol or review to be screened. It is not recommended to submit the full version of the document because it may be very long and will include sections that have little value in being screened (e.g. Overview of Similarity Check processSimilarity Check finds and highlights overlapping text between manuscript and published materialOnce logged into Similarity Check, there is the option to submit different file types for screening.
Ithenticate Similarity Index Software Installed To
Similarity Check does not accept RevMan file types (i.e. From RevMan, using software installed to print to PDF, select the required sections and print and save as a non-RevMan PDF file type. Use the Cut and Paste upload option in Similarity Check. Prepare a new document by cutting and pasting specific sections of text into a new document and save as one of the following file types: plain text, MS Word, PDF, RTF, PostScript, HTML, or XML.
This option should be used routinely.When matches are identified in a report, Similarity Check has an option to exclude one or more matching sources. This extends the Similarity Check comparison to include content not included in the iThenticate database, such as Wikipedia, and presents the collated results. It is not always advisable to exclude “small matches” to text because small matches could be direct quotes that need quotation marks and citations.Similarity Check has an option to include a simultaneous Internet search (called “websearch” in Similarity Check) in addition to the standard iThenticate database search. However, while it is possible to request references to be excluded from comparison using Similarity Check, this does not always happen and it is preferable to upload a file without this section. Text within quotation marks), reference lists, and/or “small matches” of text to avoid false positives in the similarity index.
For example, an Assistant Managing Editor/Managing Editor, Information Specialist or administrative assistant could run a document through Similarity Check and generate a report. See Table 3 for the types of Similarity Check reports where this functionality is available.CRGs should agree which editorial staff member(s) should be responsible for running the Similarity Check reports, interpreting the results, and deciding on next steps. This functionality may become less useful as the number of times a Cochrane Review is updated as the number of exclusions that need to be made increases. This functionality allows the user to exclude the protocol or original review, for example.
It highlights any overlapping text and shows you where it comes from, and how many words are overlapping in each instance (number of words is more informative than the percentage overlap, which is also provided). The Document Viewer report has two pieces of information that will guide the editorial team to have no cause for concern or to decide if any action is needed: The Document Viewer is the default setting and shows the best matches for text in a submitted document (see Figure). Similarity Check reportsThere are different modes of reporting in Similarity Check (see Table 3) some of which display different information.
Also see Copyrighted images: using in articles published in the CDSR. Clicking on the “Text-Only Report” button will change the display to other reporting modes, which are detailed in Table 3.The “Similarity Index” applies to the entire document being checked and indicates the percentage of text from the entire document which overlaps with identifies sources (matched documents) and is shown in the upper right hand side of the report.Editorial teams should be aware that Similarity Check will not identify any plagiarized figures or images, such as line drawings and photographs. In this example the highlighted text in red and green match other sources than the text in blue and are not shown.The “Document Viewer” is the chosen reporting mode. Types of Similarity Check reports ( This Similarity Check Document Viewer report shows the document being checked on the left side, highlighting matching text (in this example in red, blue and green), and the context of the matching text in the match document (Spirit MJ et al) on the right side. For further information about the similarity score, see the iThenticate website.
0 kommentar(er)
